Ghana’s Foreign Affairs Minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, has publicly denied allegations that the country received financial compensation from the United States in exchange for accepting deportees from West Africa. Speaking at the Government Accountability Series on September 15, Ablakwa addressed growing public concern and political scrutiny surrounding the arrangement, which had sparked speculation about Ghana’s motivations and the potential compromise of its sovereignty. He firmly stated that Ghana had not received “any money, compensation or material benefit” in relation to the understanding with the U.S., emphasizing that the decision was rooted in humanitarian principles rather than financial incentives.
The controversy emerged after reports suggested that deportees from other West African nations, including Nigeria and The Gambia, were being relocated to Ghana under a bilateral agreement. Critics, including opposition figures and civil society groups, questioned the transparency of the deal and accused the government of prioritizing foreign interests over national dignity. Ablakwa’s response was a clear attempt to distance the administration from these claims, asserting that Ghana’s commitment to human rights and regional solidarity guided its actions. He reiterated that the country’s security and sovereignty remain paramount and that no aspect of the agreement undermines those values.
By “washing his hands” of the financial allegations, Ablakwa aimed to shield the government from potential legal and ethical fallout. His remarks also served to reassure the public that Ghana’s foreign policy decisions are made with integrity and accountability. The minister’s clarification may help defuse tensions, but the issue continues to raise important questions about transparency, diplomatic negotiations, and the treatment of deportees within the region. As the debate unfolds, many are calling for greater public disclosure and parliamentary oversight to ensure that Ghana’s international commitments align with its constitutional principles and the expectations of its citizens.